People Business - August 2026 Progress

Report for: People Business

Report date: 19 September 2026

‣
💡Help

Overview

48

Search Visibility Score

Not available

Content Authority Score

Not available

Action Completion Score

38

AI Visibility Score

Not available

Technical Readiness Score

Not available

Improvement Score

35

Local Visibility Score

Not available

Trust & Reputation Score

📌 Executive summary

People Business made useful progress in September 2026. Search visibility increased from 46 to 48, AI visibility increased from 34 to 38 and local visibility increased from 28 to 35.

The clearest improvement is stronger service and location coverage. The Woking page reached position 1 for a relevant search and the business gained several direct AI citations. The main concern is that most wider service searches still do not show People Business. Blocked pages and old page addresses also need attention.

These are positive leading indicators. Revenue impact cannot be confirmed from the available evidence, but better qualified visibility and stronger customer proof should support future enquiries.

🔄 What changed this month

The website now has clearer service and location pages. People Business reached position 1 for “HR consultants near Woking”, position 3 for “HR training Surrey” and position 6 for “HR consultancy near Chertsey”.

Three recent five star reviews added stronger customer proof. Three sampled pages were blocked and six sampled addresses pointed to different preferred versions, creating clear work for the next month.

📈 What improved

Google search visibility improved by 2 points. AI visibility improved by 4 points, supported by three direct website citations across the assessed questions. Local visibility improved by 7 points, supported by stronger location pages and fresh reviews.

The review evidence also shows useful themes around responsive support, practical advice, clear guidance and a strong understanding of customer culture.

⚠️ What became worse

No confirmed overall decline was found. However, three blocked pages and six old addresses pointing to preferred versions are new risks in the current evidence. They may make important services or proof harder to reach.

Broad discovery also remains weak. Only 5 of 44 assessed service searches showed the website, so the positive movement has not yet become a broad market shift.

✅ Customer completed work

The evidence shows improvements to service pages, location pages and customer proof. It does not confirm which actions were completed by the customer. Completion could not be scored without clear ownership evidence.

🎯 Next three actions

  1. Fix the three blocked pages and redirect old service addresses to one preferred version.

    2. Why it matters: Customers and search services need one working route to each important page.

    Expected benefit: Fewer access barriers and clearer service discovery.

    Owner: Website owner.

    Evidence: Three sampled pages were blocked and six sampled addresses pointed elsewhere.

  2. Strengthen priority service pages for searches where People Business remains absent.

    3. Why it matters: Growth depends on reaching people who search for a problem or service rather than the company name.

    Expected benefit: More qualified search visits and stronger AI source coverage.

    Owner: Content and search owner.

    Evidence: Only 5 of 44 assessed service searches showed the website.

  3. Complete suitable local profile details, reply to reviews and continue steady review growth.

    4. Why it matters: Local competitors have stronger review volume and local visibility.

    Expected benefit: Stronger trust, better conversion support and improved local discovery.

    Owner: Marketing owner.

    Evidence: People Business has three recent five star reviews, but no stored owner replies and limited local map visibility.

💰 Expected benefit

The next actions should remove direct access problems, help more potential customers find the business through service searches and strengthen local trust. The likely return on investment signal is more qualified visibility and better support for enquiries. Revenue impact should only be reported when enquiry or sales evidence is available.

Score details & evidence

Search Visibility Score

Current score: 48. Previous month: 46. Change: +2. Confidence: Medium.

Evidence used: September and August health checks. Factors included search coverage, website foundations, content coverage, authority and local visibility. The main cause of improvement was stronger service and location page performance. Recommended action: fix access issues and strengthen missing service topics.

AI Visibility Score

Current score: 38. Previous month: 34. Change: +4. Confidence: Medium.

Evidence used: 51 assessed AI questions, including three direct website citations and one further mention. Factors included mentions, citations, answer quality and company clarity. The main cause of improvement was clearer focused content. Recommended action: add practical buyer answers and proof around each main service.

Local Visibility Score

Current score: 35. Previous month: 28. Change: +7. Confidence: Medium.

Evidence used: stored local results, stronger location pages and three recent five star reviews. Factors included local positions, profile information, reviews and location relevance. The main cause of improvement was better local content and fresh customer proof. Recommended action: complete suitable profile details, reply to reviews and build steady review growth.

Measures without a current score

Content Authority, Technical Readiness, Trust & Reputation, Action Completion and Improvement are shown as Not available. The September evidence contains useful signals for these areas, but it does not provide comparable monthly scores under the report method. No values have been invented.

Powered by Scenic Mind © 2026

Version: 0.3